But there were no WMD...
500 tons of yellowcake Uranium...
1.8 tons of partially enriched Uranium...
Centrifuges...
Blueprints...
Bomb-making parts...
New construction at known WMD facilities...
Sarin gas...
Mustard gas...
Mobile biological weapons labs...
300,000 of his own people killed by chemical weapons...
But there were no WMD and there was no imminent threat...

Source citation...?
(rolling eyes)
Posted by:carla | Sunday, 28 August 2005 at 01:17 PM
typical liberal answer. I AM THE AUTHORITY. I spent 6 years working in a USAF nuclear research laboratory for the sole purpose of identifying foreign WMD capability. MY SOURCES ARE CLASSIFIED.
However, if you want to see someone else print it, try going a simple Google search for "yellowcake uranium iraq" or any other key words you desire.
MY JOB IS NOT TO FACT CHECK FOR YOUR LAZY ASS.
The burden is on you to prove me wrong, not on me to prove me right.
Posted by:Gullyborg | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 10:42 AM
here is some help:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/8/28/110744.shtml
Posted by:TorontoJoe | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 11:02 AM
George W. Bush is a rapist who eats the heads off of live chickens when the moon is full. I can't tell you how I know this. But I'm an authority because I say so.
MY SOURCES ARE CLASSIFIED
(It sounds just as dumb coming from you, incidentally)
The burden is on you to prove me wrong, not on me to prove me right.
Prove my assertions about Bush wrong. It's not my job to fact check your lazy ass.
(Getting more dumb all the time, isn't it?)
Posted by:carla | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 11:10 AM
you only convince the people on my side just how unhinged you really are...
and the difference between your blog and mine, Carla, is that people on my side are content to simply ignore you when you say something we think is stupid. but you and your ilk view liberalism as your religion, the state as your God, and are sworn to attack as heretics all who oppose you.
we could care less.
so, since you are the zealot, go forth and fact check. meanwhile, we'll just continue to drive around in our SUV's burning fossil fuels so Bush will continue to attack middle-eastern countries for Halliburton.
Posted by:Gullyborg | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 11:36 AM
also, Gullyborg gives a reason why is (at least in his opinion) an expert, whereas Carla only says she is one because she says so. Readers have the ability to decide for themselves if working in a research lab as a weapons inspector makes Gullyborg legitimate or not. Carla offers nothing but her own self-inflated sense of ego.
Posted by:moonraper | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 11:43 AM
Carla is a bonafide moron, that's all you can say.
Gully's credentials stick out. Carla's don't.
She just shot herself, metaphorically, in the head with her silly stunt.
Posted by:Sailor Republica | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 12:20 PM
I spent 6 years working in a USAF nuclear research laboratory for the sole purpose of identifying foreign WMD capability.
vs.
I'm an authority because I say so.
Carla's inability (unwillingness?) to understand the difference between these two positions speaks volumes as to her stupidity (obtuseness?).
Posted by:Brian B | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 12:27 PM
Quite honestly... I'd like a published and reviewed source as well.
You may have laid eyes on it, and that's fine... but where did it get documented?
Posted by:SGT Jeff (IRR) | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 01:40 PM
Oh... and if your sources are classified, did you get to sign that nice little non-disclosure agreement like I did?
You know, the one that covers the rest of your natural life?
If so... bad move.
Posted by:SGT Jeff (IRR) | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 01:42 PM
Fear not, the stuff I am reporting here is all over the mainstream press and has been covered by such liberal sources as the New York Times.
It's all easily obtainable by anyone willing to spend 30 seconds looking for it.
Posted by:Gullyborg | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 03:04 PM
(sarcasm...) But, I thought we were there for the oil? What happened to the oil?
Posted by:Karl | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 03:38 PM
it's all part of the sinister Bush-Cheney-Halliburton plot to seize control of the world's oil supply... which of course coincides with the rising gasoline prices to maximize profits!
It's all corporate greed... man...
Posted by:Gullyborg | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 03:57 PM
So ... this means that Halliburton-Bush-Cheney are responsible for creating Hurricane Katrina so the price of oil would skyrocket, forcing us gas-sucking-SUV-owners to by it at such inflated prices, right? You just *know* the moonbats are thinking it, even if they aren't saying it! %^}
Posted by:FMIL | Monday, 29 August 2005 at 09:27 PM