Sponsors



  • Advertise on blogs

    The links directly above and below are advertisements only. The views and opinions expressed by advertisers are solely their own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of Resistance is futile!

    Gullyborg is a proud capitalist, and encourages you to explore these NON-GOOGLE advertisements.



    Learn all about diets and more with Diet Spotlight.

Shop Amazon


  • If you are going to shop, shop Amazon.com. Find just about everything you want from the comfort of your own home. By searching Amazon.com through this site, you are helping to support Resistance is futile!

  • Search Now:

Worthy Causes

Endorsements

Blogfamily

Dead Fish Wrappers and Bird Cage Liners

Carnival of Cordite Submitters

« Crazy things people look for on the intertubes... | Main | The crowd is shrinking just a little »

Monday, 15 October 2007

Comments

HMIL

That's NOT funny ... now I'll NEVER get to sleep tonight!

Nyah!

Jim in KFalls

2032 - Just in time for Chelsea Clinton to run as President...

The other scenario is Hillary Clinton wins the 2008 election - Jeb Bush runs in 2016 and wins - Chelsea Runs in 2024 and wins - Jenna Bush runs in 2032 and wins = 52 straight years with a Bush or Clinton in the white house...

Right as Rain

Unless something extraordinary happens this will be the first time since 1972 that the G.O.P. hasn't had a Bush or Dole on the national ticket.

Gullyborg

Nothing extraordinary. There won't be a Bush or a Dole on the ticket.

My gut is telling me Thompson wins the nomination, then goes for someone far outside the Beltway for VP. That would rule out Dole. And no way in hell he would be dumb enough to choose Jeb Bush (although Jeb could be a great cabinet member or ambassador, and could be on a ticket in 2016).

Gullyborg

Oh, and not Jenna. Jeb's son, George Prescott.

But maybe Jenna after that...

Right as Rain

If it's Thompson he'll pick someone from the Northeast or the West as his running mate. The dynamics for Republicans are different than for Democrats, so two southerners on the G.O.P. ticket is a potential problem, but not so much for Democrats, who probably need at least one Southerner on the ticket.

He may actually go with McCain. His cred with the base is strong enough that he could pick someone who would normally piss off the base, and McCain appeals to voters outside the normal G.O.P. demographic, and could make them competitive in states that have been Blue for a long time.

Gullyborg

Giuliani would be a better choice than McCain. If you are going to piss off the far right with your VP, may as well do it with someone who can actually add some votes to the party.

I also think a Rocky Mountain governor would be a smart choice... Bill Owen?

I'm a little sad Thommy Thompson is out endorsing Giuliani. He would have been better off in Fred's camp. Imagine a Fred/Tommy Thompson ticket... they could sell themselves as the Thompson Twins.

Sakaki

Their campaign theme could be "King For A Day"

Though, I'm a happy guy when it comes to Thompson/Hunter, or possibly Thompson/Pawlenty (He'd be able to probably take Minnesota).

Gullyborg

I don't see Hunter on the ballot.

His appeal is very limited to the far right, and geographically he is not as big a draw as you might think. He won't have any effect on California, as his House district is only a small part of a huge state.

Also, he and Fred may be right on for most issues, but they have a HUGE difference of opinion on foreign policy, and that is a HUGE problem - much more so than a hypothetical ticket where one is pro-life and one is pro-choice (foreign policy is something the President actually does, as opposed to abortion laws which, frankly, have little to no bearing on the White House).

Another good person would be Tom Ridge. He would probably carry Pennsylvania, and that by itself would make him a HUGE asset on the ticket.

Right as Rain

I don't see Fred taking on Rudy Julie Annie on the ticket--he's not going to run with a New York Rino, and I don't see Rudy being happy as a second banana (frankly, I'm not sure that McCain would do well as a Veep, either).

My hunch is that Fred would choose someone young--perhaps Condi.

I do hope that Fred starts looking more alive on the campaign trail. He's my first choice, but, so far, he's not doing a great job of selling himself--he had a natural momentum as he entered the race, and that seems to be dissipating way too quickly.

Gullyborg

Condi would be my dream pick. I just don't see her trying to do anything to stay in DC after 2009.

Right as Rain

I don't know...I think Condi likes having real power, and Cheney has changed the role of the Veep, at least in G.O.P. admins, so they have real power. That'll be hard for her to give up.

Maybe he'll choose Emma Thompson as his running mate.

Gullyborg

As long as she doesn't do it as Sybil Trelawney. We already have a problem with our divinations in the NSA and CIA.

Right as Rain

I'll be an enthusiastic supporter of the G.O.P. ticket if Fred's the nominee, and I can accept McCain or Romney, though I won't be totally happy with either one, but they've been basically on board with the Republican philosophy (yes, with a few glaring exceptions) for a long time.

I just don't trust Giuliani, and he seems to have the same womanizing issues as Bill Clinton.

Gullyborg

the guy who is just right on your issues 80% of time isn't your 20% enemy. no candidate is perfect, and trying to achieve perfection always leads to disappointment.

Giuliani has his flaws, and some of them are serious, but I believe he would be FAR better for America than Hillary would ever be.

Of course, I want a better candidate. But I work with what's there.

And if we do have Giuliani as our nominee, he can do a lot to keep the conservative message going, and build for the future, by choosing a solid running mate.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Contact Gullyborg


  • g u l l y b o r g A T
    g m a i l D O T c o m

Numbers!



  • Ignore this
    google91704c084091e61d.html