Sponsors



  • Advertise on blogs

    The links directly above and below are advertisements only. The views and opinions expressed by advertisers are solely their own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of Resistance is futile!

    Gullyborg is a proud capitalist, and encourages you to explore these NON-GOOGLE advertisements.



    Learn all about diets and more with Shapely Secrets.

Shop Amazon


  • If you are going to shop, shop Amazon.com. Find just about everything you want from the comfort of your own home. By searching Amazon.com through this site, you are helping to support Resistance is futile!

  • Search Now:

Worthy Causes

Endorsements

Blogfamily

Dead Fish Wrappers and Bird Cage Liners

Carnival of Cordite Submitters

« Gilchrist is nuts | Main | Life after the White House? »

Thursday, 13 December 2007

Comments

I can hear the Brottons now...

BUT BUT BUT HE'S A CHRISTIAN!!!

(insert 800 lines of copy/paste press releases and scripture)

Yes, he's a Christian.

You know what?

SO IS EVERY OTHER CANDIDATE ON BOTH SIDES (except maybe Kucinich - I honestly don't know but I think he is maybe atheist).

Now that we have put THAT issue to rest, and confirmed that every (viable) contender of both parties is, in fact, of one form of Christian faith or another, can we PLEASE get back to ISSUES?

Since I'm a Jew, I am going to support the candidate who can best stand up to the threat of international militant islamofacism. That ain't Mike Huckabee.

Didn't Mike Huckabee say the Jews killed the baby Jesus? Or was it that Mitt Romney is Satan's brother? It's hard to keep track of these things.

Hey, Anthony and Tammy, don't you keep putting "Romney/Huckabee" in all your spam comments?

Are you that stupid?

Huckabee actually BELIEVES Romney's faith is a demonic cult. Romney has nothing but complete disdain for the ingorant rube Huckabee. They will NEVER be on the same ticket. If one is the nominee, the other will be completely shut out. If one is elected, the other won't even be considered for a low grade cabinet post.

Get a clue.

This is why I say Fred Thompson is the best of the lot. He keeps his faith private, he stands up to schoolmarms, and his stare can cook a thanksgiving turkey in 1 minute.

Reagan's 11th commandment does not apply to the Huckster. He's a Dem. At best he's a RINO.

Looks like NWR is pissed off for other valid reasons:

http://nwrepublican.blogspot.com/2007/12/if-not-for-mike-huckabee-carol-sue.html

I really hope he goes down in flames before votes are cast.

Mike Huckabee is the second coming of Jimmy Carter.

A big government Elmer Gantry; just what I've been waiting for. Where did this horror come from, and what kind of McGovernesque blow-out are his supporters pushing?

Reverend Huckabee's Christianity is one of the major reasons I will not vote for him. Not that he's Christian, but that he's running as a Christian -- presenting his religion as a major reason why one should support him. I'm a secular pro-freedom individualist, and I'm utterly fed up with the increasing mixing of religion into public discourse.

I'd vote for Giuliani. I'd vote for Thompson. Romney or McCain I'd stay home. If it's Hillary vs. Reverend Huckabee, I'll vote for Hillary. Policywise he offers me nothing, and he advances the role of religion in Republican politics in a way I find pernicious and destructive.

Every freak of nature in politics is coming out of the woodwork to run for president.

Obama is my man. At least he's got some class, and he's the only one besides John Edwards who does.

Huckabee and Romney are jokes.

I'm sorry, I only read the first couple of paragraphs and decided I must make this post:

Is having more women in your cabinet really the benchmark you want to use to promote that you are "Pro" women's rights? I see that argument being a lot like polygamy. I have multiple wives therefore I am pro women.

Doesn't hold a lot of water for me.

Maybe more people will understand how some of us feel about the prospect of Giuliani as the nominee.

Now, if only Thompson were running a competent campaign. Or if Ron Paul worked on -- well -- not giving people the impression of nuttiness. Then maybe the Republicans could have a real candidate.

I'm a republican man who would hold my nose and turn into a conservative democrat if Huckabee were the Nominee.

I'm a republican man who would hold my nose and turn into a conservative democrat if Huckabee were the Nominee.

Instapundit linked to this takedown from the Thompson campaign.

If all this is true, I'll have to rethink my "Anyone But Hillary" vow. At least a weathervane sometimes points in the right direction.

The first quote is a fairly direct paraphrase of what the Bible says. You're certainly free to disagree but treating it as if it were an oddity from outer space makes you look badly educated and rather parochial.

I'd probably vote conservative, if not for the fact that I don't want to live in a theocracy. Apparently the Republicans don't understand what our society was like when the church did run it. For those of you who forgot medieval history, reference modern day Iran.

It is also a direct take from the Bible to say that gays should be stoned to death.

It is also a direct take from the Bible to say that if someone preaches a false religion he should be stoned to death.

It is also a direct take from the Bible to say that if you rape a virgin, you can pay off her father and take her as your bride.

Don't give me that sanctimonius "it's in the Bible" shit.

If you read the Koran, it quickly becomes obvious that Shariah (which no one in their right minds wants to live by) agrees quite well with Biblical/Old testament law.
Our founders bled and died to give us the opportunity to form our own beliefs according to our own conscience.
If religion means so much to these politicians, why do they use it as a cheap tool to manipulate the masses into giving them personal power?

I can't imagine voting for Rev. Gomer Huckabee - does anyone really think he has any conservative appeal beyond the single issue christian right?

That is like nominating John F. Kerry because he knows how to salute.

It also highlights the problem with starting the process in Iowa.

I'm a Republican female and I'm not impressed with Huckabee. At all. I ain't votin' for Hillary! though.

I'm a FredHead. He's a non-practicing Christian like me, but that's not why. I'm with Joe Lieberman (not really) - I'm voting for someone who will continue an aggressive American defense posture. Huckabee hasn't even proved he believes in us defending ourselves period, plus he's for big government solutions. Feh.

What ever happened to natural gender rolls and family? I'm not saying women need to stay in the kitchen, but someone needs to stay home to raise the children. And yes, that someone could be the man too.

Independent for McCain ...
Honest, patriotic, smart, Christian, conservative, will defend the country against real threats. For the life of me I can't understand why he is being largely ignored.

Mike Huckabee is quite possibly the only republican candidate who could make me support Ron Paul. I would sooner cut my arm off than vote for Her Royal Clintoness.

Heh! I've never bought into that whole "11th Commandment" stuff. "Don't speak ill of a fellow Republican"? Sorry - if they're asses, I'm going to note that fact.

George W. Bush is an ass when it comes to illegal aliens. So is McCain. Huckabee would be more appropriately named "Wannabee".

It's small wonder that the Dems are happy with the Huckster - he presents such a target-rich environment.

I want to remind everyone that 4 years ago at this time, Howard Dean was annointed the democratic nominee.

I keep reminding people of that myself.

However, there is one big difference between Huck and Dean:

When Dean ran, he had been successfully building up his campaign and enjoyed front runner status in the polls for about a year, then collapsed.

Huck has been the one no one paid attention to until just a few weeks ago. He is the guy surging when the long-time front runners have faltered.

Huck might be more like John Kerry than Howard Dean. Kerry was all but written off, then began to surge just before the Iowa caucus as voters began to see that Dean maybe wasn't the best choice. Then in the general, he was a nightmare. That could be the same story with Huck.

I hope not.

What I hope is that people will see that Huck is both Dean AND Kerry - that he is the guy who will falter AND that, if nominated, he would be a big let down. I hope they see this in the next two weeks, and allow someone like Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani to emerge for us.

OK, I just have to weigh in on this.

The Bible verse was taken totally out of context. It has nothing to do with women being subservient to men. It's relationship/marriage advice to couples. Yes, the actual verse says that women are supposed to submit to their husbands ... but it also says that men are supposed to submit to their wives and love them like they love the church.

That has absolutely nothing to do with anything. The majority of Christians are familiar with the verse and with the context and it has nothing to do with the Huckster being pro-woman.

Being a female conservative Christian Republican myself, I refuse to vote for him, too. The more I hear, the more I read, the more I discuss, the more I think ... the more the light shines on what he's done and how he's governed, and what his ethics are really like ... the more I'm certain he's the wrong choice for the GOP.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of Christian Republicans out there that don't bother to read, think, discuss ... they are only Republicans out of habit and have a lot in common with the dems in that they rely on "feelings" too much.

This applies to my mom ... she's taken in by the Huckster and recently told me he's her candidate ... it's likely just 'cause he's a Christian ... the same reason she voted for Jimmy Carter. (I hope she has the good grace to be embarrassed about *that* decision by now.)

I can only hope that more comes out and that the lamestream media start covering it more and more ... but sheeple being what they are, they will probably bleat away and ignore it. I hope the intelligent among us will have the good sense to make sure he doesn't get the nomination.

The Huck Stops Here!

"it's likely just 'cause he's a Christian "

As I keep saying, EVERY ONE of the GOP candidates is a Christian.

Saying "I'm voting for Huckabee because he is Christian" makes as much sense as saying "I'm voting for Huckabee because he has pulse" or "he wore a tie" or "he speaks English."

Yes, it is admirable to want such qualities as a heartbeat, the ability to dress, and the ability to speak in a common language in a candidate. But since every candidate passes those tests, you need to base your selection on other factors.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Contact Gullyborg


  • g u l l y b o r g A T
    g m a i l D O T c o m

Conservative Oregon Blog Roll Alliance


  • Would you like to add your blog to the Conservative Oregon Blog Roll Alliance? Read this and learn how to become a COBRA!

The Alliance of Free Blogs

Numbers!



  • Ignore this
    google91704c084091e61d.html