Well, we've had a few days to think about Measure 37 and the activist judge who "found" it unconstitutional.
Other blogs have handled the legal arguments. Other blogs have analyzed the loss of individual liberty to the hands of the State.
I'm going to address a different issue: what this means for upcoming elections. And I'm going to go out on a limb and say something controversial: this may be the best thing to happen to Oregon.
What?
A single appointed judge throwing a sucker punch to the guts of over one million voters and damaging private property rights AND the ballot initiative process is a good thing?
You betcha! In the long run...
This case will, of course, be appealed. And knowing what I know about the Oregon courts, my estimate is that the case will be heard by the Oregon Court of Appeals in the next few months, and a decision will be reached about a year from now. And I fully expect the liberal activist Oregon Court of Appeals to uphold this case.
In other words, the decision, which today only affects a single county, will become state law about a month or so before the 2006 election for Governor, the Legislature, the courts, and a number of county and local offices.
And voters will be pissed.
I heard Kevin Mannix and Jason Atkinson talking on the radio about this today. Ron Saxton was on as well, but I missed him. Kevin and Jason both sounded pretty ticked off. But there was a marked difference in their tones. Kevin talked like a lawyer, ready to draft legislation, etc., to fix the problem. And that's a good thing. But Jason sounded like an Oregonian. I could tell he was fighting to keep his emotion in check (also a good thing), but I got the chills hearing him talk because he captured in his criticism of the decision the spirit of the million Oregonians who, once again, had their decision cast out by a single elitist.
I think voters who hear Jason speak about Measure 37 are going to find not another politician, but someone who thinks like they do. He is ready for change in Oregon. And I believe the people will finally be ready as well. If he can develop a positive message about the issues of the Measure 37 decision, a message of a change in the political culture of the State, and get his message across to the voters in the next few months, he can walk away with the primary and the general election.
And of course, it isn't just Atkinson who stands to gain from this. Mannix will also gain, as he too is on the side of the vast majority of Oregonians. Saxton might also pick up new supporters, depending on how he comes off. This is a gain for the Republican Party as a whole, as the democRat Governor and the democRats in control of the Senate have been weak on Measure 37 from the beginning. Atkinson, Mannix, and possibly Saxton will each siphon votes, not from each other, but from Kulongoski.
This could also be a huge leap for newcomers to the Oregon courts. Jack Roberts can probably ride this one all the way to a black robe. And if a credible conservative challenger to Justice Durhan comes along, the upcoming statewide detest of incumbent judges could result in a major shift on the Supreme Court of Oregon. And God help any member of the Court of Appeals up for re-election in 2006 who is part of a majority that upholds the trial court decision!
Kevin Mannix: are you listening? Now, more than ever, you have the power to enter the race for Supreme Court of Oregon and dethrone Justice Durham. Between Measure 37 and the "live sex acts for cash is protected free expression" cases, we are overdue for an upheaval.
This will also have a huge impact on the Legislature. I think we can expect the Oregon House to gain Republican seats, and the Oregon Senate to shift into Republican control. Jim Torrey has probably gone from a "could defeat the incumbent" to a "could pummel the incumbent beyond recognition" candidate for State Senate.
Of course, as this is a state issue, not a federal issue, you'd expect the effect on U.S. House races to be minimal. But the sheer outrage among Oregonians against the status quo in light of Measure 37 could be so great that even Jim Feldkamp might have a very real shot at defeating Peter DeFazio.
And what will happen come 2008?
This just might be the one single issue capable of causing enough of a shift in voter perception to put Oregon seriously into play for the 2008 Presidential election. I'm not saying the Republicans will win the state over this. But I am saying that, since Republicans have only lost this state to democRats by one or two percent in the last two elections, a sea change in the attitudes of voters towards the establishment (which, in Oregon, means democRats), could be more than enough to change that 1-2% from blue to red.
Friday, October 14, 2005, just might have been the day that Oregon became a conservative Republican "red state."
I may need to buy that judge a beer.
Eloquently put. Now, to spread it to the masses!
Posted by: Sailor Republica | Monday, 17 October 2005 at 05:30 PM
This ruling goes alot farther than land-use or judicial elitists.
It strikes at the very difference between liberal and conservative thought. Top down dictatorship or decentralized liberty of choice.
This is a great opportunity for the Republican party to show this difference.
Posted by: foxtrot13 | Monday, 17 October 2005 at 07:02 PM
It's funny that every time liberals reveal their true intentions in a sweeping way (Multnoman County gay marriage anyone?) the citizens always rise up against it.
It's only throught the process of slow indoctrination that their agenda gets through.
Posted by: Daniel | Monday, 17 October 2005 at 10:45 PM
Gully,
I agree with your analysis. This could be a windfall if we capitalize on it.
As for the candidates, I didn't hear them. Jason, whenever I hear him, is passionate about land use, so I am sure he came across really well.
Kevin...I like the idea of his offering solutions. Getting mad is fine, but as I and others have said, we need someone who can turn that mad into policy and get it passed, or their presence just serves to make us feel good hearing them talk about it.
I don't trust Saxton on this issue (or any other, really). Jason and Kevin both supported M37 actively. Where was Ron?
I still want to know what Jason is actually going to DO to turn this passion to action. But in the meantime, I am glad to hear our candidates standing up for the rights of property owners, and the rights of voters.
Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 02:13 AM
Since Saxton lives in Portland he probably was against M37 as thats what the popular outward opinion is. Of course when people do the solitary task of filling out their ballot that changes.
I also like the reference Daniel made about gay marriage and Multnomah County. This underlines what liberals elitists like the ACLU really think of the rule of law. M37 is just more in this vein.
Posted by: foxtrot13 | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 07:54 AM
Gully, I actually think this could extend to the Congressional elections. The House just voted on the Pombo update to the Endangered Species Act that has a clause requiring compensation to effected property owners. Sound familiar? DeFuzzyOne voted for a substitute bill that did not include any compensation. If Feldkamp is smart he will paint DeFazio with an Anti-37 brush every chance he gets.
Posted by: Boze Noze | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 11:39 AM
For the record, Saxton was a supporter of Measure 37. He did NOT support the earlier version, Measure 7. He claims he opposed Measure 7 because it was poorly drafted, not because he opposed the idea behind it. What sort of track record he has other than his statements for and against these measures is unknown to me.
Posted by: Gullyborg | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 12:41 PM
Dude, Dream on! ORE will never be a blue state, thanks to our educated population who gets out to vote. Head over to Eastern Oregon if you want to hang out in Red territory. And look at your own blog title, "Resistance is futile." Your resistance to accept the truth has landed you such a successful blog. Now it's time to fact the facts and quit speaking up for the party that doesn't give a shit about you.
Posted by: dan | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 01:12 PM
Thank you, Dan, for the intelligent insight that Oregon will never be a blue state.
Posted by: Gullyborg | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 02:23 PM
I think that was the only thing intelligent that came out of Dan's mouth, Gully.
Posted by: Sailor Republica | Tuesday, 18 October 2005 at 03:34 PM
Yeah, right. Poll ten Oregonians and ask them what Measure 37 is. I bet no more than one can tell you. Dream, dream, dream.
Posted by: Liberal Intelligencia | Monday, 24 October 2005 at 05:17 PM
Liberals always lose whenever they misunderestimate the intelligence and awareness of the average voter.
Posted by: Gullyborg | Tuesday, 25 October 2005 at 02:27 PM
We in Oregon finally have a REAL choice for governor, not just the two socialist liberals from the supposed 2-party ( actually one when you get down to it ) scam.... I'm talking of course about Mary Starrett, the ONLY Constitutional, GODly, pro-life, very pro-2nd Amendment ( her brother is Kevin of Ore. Firearms Federation !!) candidate in the running. If you're tired of the same old you-know-what and want to see a real change, check out marystarrettforgovernor.com and think outside the proverbial box. As they say-- you'll be glad you did !!!
Posted by: Jim C. | Sunday, 20 August 2006 at 05:18 PM